Read the Florence City Council officially launched the voting mechanism, solemnly Florence Court officially abolished 700 years ago (then the state court) decision of the Dante, the official allowed him to return to his hometown of Florence. To be honest, I do Gankaiwanduan ... ...
Effective from the decision whether or not to see, under "Upon the death of the parties, the ruling will cease to be" the relevant provisions of international justice, as being "decision" parties, Dante had died 687 years, the body no longer has the element of life, should not suffer judicial accountability. Therefore, this sentence has been a natural death.
Changes from the power structure, this decision also already invalid. Next to Dante "decision" is then the national court (the Apennine peninsula in 1971, before a small country everywhere, often do not belong to Florence was a sovereign country), the passage of time, as the "State" Florence has not longer exists, now of Florence, only an Italian city, the city's judiciary neither the obligation nor the right to enforce the former regime have been dead machine "decision."
But why should people of Florence City Council solemnly go start "voting mechanism", that "official removed" 700 years ago under that particular regime, the court made specific "decision" mean? Are people is unnecessary?
Many of the history of the struggle is often difficult to "on" or "wrong" to express, and that regardless of whether the regime was representative of the people, represent progress or justice, Zongzhi national courts a "traitor" do "limited return, unless the self- penalty, or die "decision, difficult to say what is wrong. From Dante's point of view, since the regime you think of me as a sinner, that I, as the opposite of you, make plans for your subversive, what is unreasonable?
In many cases, history is not to dwell too much with Africa. One can no longer formally revoked effective "decision" that today's Shimin city of Florence, Dante has completely changed the right view, where it Zhuyao not Zaiyushipi "understanding" Dante's "traitorous" behavior, but rather Zhongxin identified a landmark for the specific historical and cultural giant, played a huge role in promoting.
Read this by starting the "voting mechanism" resulting from "removed" the decision, I think many, many ... ...
Last year, I should write about "root of Hainan - FAQ Soong family," a book, wrote that the death of Soong Ching Ling Soong Ching Ling in 1981, that the agencies call their relatives in the United States Song Meiling Soong Ching Ling, TL Soong, welcome them to come back to attend the funeral of Soong Ching Ling ... ... sincere attitude, of course, are formal tone.
But in my view, some of which still exist in law did not completely solve the problem?
In 1948, Mao Zedong and Zhu De signed by the Central Military Commission "of the Kuomintang war criminals to justice brought to the notice", by Kai-shek is listed as 23 war criminals. Despite the past 30 years, although the CPC Central Committee in these years have been sub-7 times pardoned all of the KMT military and political officials in custody. However, for terms to "catch" the 47 top war criminals and has not been to most of the actual capture of this notice has not been declared "catch" the period of validity, that is, in the absence of a resolution to re-declare "cease implementation of the" before This "catch the notice" can only be regarded as still valid. The military, police and even citizens, prisoners of war coming out soon discover, has the obligation to arrest and the police authorities seized and turned over to stand trial.
Now the agency has been invited to catch a no lifting of the "war criminals" come back, no time limit on its own with the above a "track down notice" from the legal conflict is occurring?
Even in the late 80s and the 90s, our leaders have frequently issued an open letter with a call or a way to issue to the Taiwan leader Chiang Ching-kuo "peaceful reunification" calls, and welcomes Taiwan in accordance with the Chiang Kai-shek's desire to send his body back to the mainland for burial.
Because the text has not been declared by law the "catch the notice" to stop the implementation of, or be abolished, so people from the legal perspective, perhaps that is too much trouble - if the "catch the notice" is still valid. It is not Chiang Kai-shek still are "war criminals"? And if he still is No. war criminals, on what basis he will be eligible for a grand burial it?
- The world's fear of the word "serious" word, but there are things one can not but link is serious. China and Italy, of course, varies greatly, however, Florence start "voting mechanism", "announced the withdrawal of" 700 years ago on Dante's "decision" is not also a little bit so enlightening?
No comments:
Post a Comment