Saturday, August 21, 2010

Good faith interpretation of the vicious friction(三)

Finally, someone came out of subversion: the subversive in-depth study, research, first set the Michelangelo to "fame" of the generation, and all apparent seriousness, declared: "Laocoon" is not ancient Greek sculpture materials, but Michelangelo's, Milosevic is out of a "big price" the idea of carving his "Laocoon," buried in the ground, by "doing the old" and was "digging" out ... ...

If those who hold this theory is most people, you and I will certainly now assert that "nonsense", but she happens is a famous figure - Columbia University art history expert, Dr. Ryan • Kate Sen.

According to historical records: "Laocoon" is in in January 1506 was found in Rome. And as early as 1496 to 1500, Michelangelo sculpture in Rome along the "Bacchus Baccus" and "condolences to Jesus" and other works and greatly eyebrows. 1501 before he returned to Florence from Rome, created the "David" Pope Julius II ... ... the "Laocoon" into the Vatican Museum, Michelangelo immediately after the call to identify. Michelangelo concluded that this statue is the encyclopedia of the Roman first century AD Pliny in his "Natural History" in the description of that respect, the book praised that respect, "Laocoon" sculptures "and paintings than any have high bronze statue of ... ... "

Today, a well-known experts in art history famous university declared that "Laocoon," a fraud, if true, this definitely affects the development process of ancient art history and development of gait.
Although this "discovery" As soon as he released, would attract the numerous refuted, but it is not without some nod with appreciation.

In addition, it is said neither refuted nor appreciated by some experts, is finding a new perspective, which might dip out when it short, do not lead to art sculpture, world "nuclear explosion" dogged.

S may all be well-intentioned, but caused by friction and collision, but was sometimes violent, disgusting, or even "aggressive" ... ...

But thus it can be asserted, "Reading is to blame?"

No comments:

Post a Comment